From: mjg223 (mjg223@is7.nyu.edu)
Date: Sat Oct 02 1999 - 00:13:26 MDT
> This doesn't mean I take everything a PhD says as law. As a general rule I
> never pay any attention to psychologists, people with 'evolutionary' in
> their title, artificial intelligence researchers, geneticists, or anyone
> who's spent time at the Santa Fe Institute.
Having spent the day toiling over applications to graduate programs in
cognitive science and AI, this remark tickled me. I certainly
sympathize with the sentiment - there's a disgraceful amount of
academically-sanctioned bogosity floating around.
That said, a PhD implies to me that an author is at least familiar
with the literature of the field, and that they're willing to defend
their position in an informed and scientific manner. I'd pay more
attention, bearing in mind the heuristic misses sometimes.
In my own case, I'm just going for an advanced degree because it
improves the odds I'll someday be paid to fiddle around with this
stuff. That, and it beats working for a living.
-matt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:23 MST