Re: Applied Libertiariansism (Was Re: kathryn's comments)

From: Kathryn Aegis (k_aegis@mindspring.com)
Date: Sat Sep 11 1999 - 21:41:58 MDT


To accuse me, or any other woman on this list of having a problem with men
as a gender is absolute nonsense. The most beloved person in my life is a
man, and a very masculine one at that.

I view your diatribe as a revealing of what you think of women, more than
of what we think of men. I hope that you will think about that, and stop
using transhumanist and libertarian ideas as a platform for your own anger
towards women. Until then, I do not plan to respond to any more of this.

Kathryn Aegis

At 09:57 PM 9/11/99 -0400, Michael Lorrey wrote:
>Women may be all for what they see as freedom for themselves (actually
>security and protection from all those evil men), but at the expense of
>freedoms of men. Being libertarian for yourself, but fascist toward
>others in the end does not make you a libertarian. How about being for
>freedom for all, regardless of gender? Feminism today is not about
>equality, but superiority. Its the "I've got mine, screw you." mentality
>of politics.... If we men complain we are labeled misogynists,
>chauvinists, sexists, being 'inflammatory', etc. When you complain about
>unfair treatment its 'justifiable'. Double standards, anyone? How about
>you stop confusing freedom with security?
>
>Mike Lorrey
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:07 MST