Re: sci:Understanding Neuroscience: (O'Dell & Bradbury Revised)

From: Gabriele Betti (lbetti@dinonet.it)
Date: Mon Sep 06 1999 - 09:20:20 MDT


Hello,
I'd like to know if there is a connection between temperature, brain,
tumors(?).
Could it be possible to make a connection between these factors and social
behaviour?
Thanks,
Gabriele

At 13.37 03/09/99 -0600, you wrote:
>Robert Bradbury wrote:
>>It would seem to require an isolated part of the mind that can produce
>>random interrupts.
>
>I wrote:
>>You're right it would
>
>I take that back! I had only 2 hours sleep that night and wasn't thinking
>as straight as I should have been when replying to your post.
>
>It would not require interrupts. Especially an "isolated" one. I don't
>know where the Hell you came up with that conclusion.
>
>All that is required is a near continuous input to produce these constant
>thoughts. One thought leads to another, leads to another, leads to another,
>etc... The body's sensory inputs are one of these types of input. Also
>thoughts act as feedback. No that is not perpetual. The energy is coming
>from the chemical reactions in the body.
>
>Me goal here when I say this is not to offend you but to point out an
>observation. I'm starting to doubt your understanding of neuroscience.
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:03 MST