From: Ken Meyering (ken@define.com)
Date: Sun Aug 29 1999 - 17:08:42 MDT
"Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@www.aeiveos.com> wrote:
> Well this is one of the unresolved areas in nanotech. One suggestion is
> for the machines to disassemble themselves on intruder detection. You can
> easily sense if your temperature is being abnormally lowered and warm
> yourself up to normal temperature or disassemble. I'm fairly sure that a
> nanobot could detect itself being X-rayed and actively respond. I doubt
> that there is any exploratory method that you could use that the nanobot
> could not detect. Remember all of those methods they used to hide
> evidence in Mission Impossible? They only get fancier in the nanotech
> world.
Thank you for this explanation. One of the things I keep forgetting
is how much physical space you actually have for sophisticated
security mechanisms. Maybe it's easier to detect malicious intent?
Nanotech public relations involves emphasizing the positive and
eliminating the negative, but realistically it seems that blue goo is
the most practical solution. A complex design issue: what are the
rules that direct the robotic nanopolice that detect motives and
modify behavior? Will they be simple principles, or elaborate
encyclopedias of convoluted laws?
In terms of conflict reduction, direct modification of the brains of
the citizens seems like a logical solution to the problem. As scary
as it sounds, sociopathic and Hitler-like at first, it seems that it
will be hard to resist waving the magic wand to directly remove the
warfare from society on a neural level. "You're still free."
Experience suggests the mass populace will not be involved in such
decisions. Probably it will be a military decision, with cooperation
from a few hundred scientists who are forced to make a tough
judgement call.
Environmentalist nanotech experts say a top priority is to "get this
mess cleaned up." Beyond the physical symptoms, the deeper mess is
cultural identity that consumes and pollutes excessively. Do you
create an army of pollution eating nanomachines, or modify the
culture to eliminate polluting behaviors? Why not get to the root
cause? This type of education and communication will surely be on
the unconscious level, for efficiency. Or will a benevolent
totalitarian government simply transfer the populace into a simulated
safe world?
-------------------
ken@define.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:56 MST