Re: SI Comparative Advantages [was Re: Free Will] (fwd)

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Thu Aug 19 1999 - 08:09:12 MDT


"Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@www.aeiveos.com> writes:

> The question comes down to *survival* in your ecological niche.
> If SIs know all the laws of physics, how the universe works,
> are able to watch & simulate any potential dangers, know that
> the "magical fantasy worlds" are nothing but senseless diversions
> for the uploads, etc. then *why not sleep*?
>
> You, as a human, may have "curiosity", but the real question you
> have to answer is -- is there an endless supply of unanswered
> questions to feed that curiosity?

This is an interesting question. Obviously, there are an infinite
number of mathematical questions to ponder (and an infinite number of
different kinds of questions to ponder, and so on), which implies an
infinite amount of purely mental entertainment. If we assume that SIs
are hardcore realists (they all are decendants from Carter-Zimmerman
polis) and avoid such fantasies, then the question is whether there
are an endless supply of questions about the physical universe to
explore. This seems to relate to how complex it can be. It seems that
the most complex systems around in this scenario are the SIs
themselves, and their activities and artefacts. I can't see any reason
why not they could get involved in endless coevolutionary races
towards increasing complexity, that are both relevant for their
survival and interesting ("I wonder how the Magellan Superposition
Alliance will react if I cause clenchirations in the armiphlange?").

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:48 MST