Re: Bioastronomy [was Bloated Stars and excess IR] (fwd)

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@www.aeiveos.com)
Date: Sat Aug 14 1999 - 20:48:00 MDT


> Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org> wrote:

> I wrote:
> > At some energy density, I presume we turn energy into matter, yes?
>
> That would be nice. If that happens we've just gotten rid of the
> material constraint as well as the energy constraint.

Not quite. We can breed any elements we want if you want
to devote enough energy to it. However, the rate of production
is *very* slow. You also have to sacrifice energy for current
thought to produce the elements for enhanced future thought.
I would not want to be the person responsible for the present-value
analysis of that equation!

>
> The only remaining constraint will be the rate of growth...
>
Yes, as soon as you max out your solar system in terms of
energy/materials, your growth rate declines sharply.
Though it remains interesting in terms of what *exactly*
you want to think about. The sun produces enough energy
in ~50 years to break/recast all of the atomic bonds
in the non-stellar material. So in that time frame
(or less if you are clever about chemical transformations)
you can "rearchitect" your computers to think optimally
about something completely different.

It is interesting if you consider the growth curve --
nonexistant, slow, somewhat faster, exponential, very slow.
(That is over a ~5-6 billion year period if we are typical.)
However the "growth curve" may be disconnected from the
"thought/knowledge curve" in ways we cannot currently comprehend.

Robert



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:46 MST