Re: Gene Therapy & Ethics (fwd)

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@www.aeiveos.com)
Date: Wed Aug 11 1999 - 15:21:40 MDT


Greg Stock promoted:
>Human Artificial Chromosome (HAC) to embyros to allow "activation"
>and/or insertion of genes at later life-points leads me to raise
>the following point.

HAC, what a great idea!!! Wish I had one.......

It is not limited to the germ line idea promoted by Greg/John.
Several other groups have invented human artificial chromosomes
and it will presumably be an area of much patent dispute should
they ever become popular.

> Great points as usual Robert, I would tend to agree, maybe the HAC
> could have an autodestruct feature that could be triggered to
> eliminate itself in case the individual chooses to do so?

This *is* feasible, take a pill that activates a sequence that
digests the "programable" HAC present in the germline. The fundamental
dispute remains however -- should parents be allowed to engineer
"in" the HAC before the child "opts in". Or should all potentially
non-essential modifying genetic therapies be prevented before you
can give informed consent???

Robert



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:43 MST