From: GBurch1@aol.com
Date: Tue Aug 10 1999 - 06:07:03 MDT
In a message dated 99-08-09 23:57:57 EDT, spike66@ibm.net (Spike Jones) wrote:
> For those of you who were in on the conversation at Extro4 regarding
> the nozzles on the space shuttle solid rocket boosters, they do indeed
> have two axis gimballed nozzles. see:
>
> http://www.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/technology/sts-newsref/srb.html#srb-tvc
Mea culpa . . . just shows to go you that error forcefully asserted (by me,
for instance) can be believed for a short time, at least, by even a very well
informed and smart person (Spike, for instance). I guess I've spent more
time being amazed by the SSMEs than the SRBs over the years . . . I've also
always thought of the SRBs as just scaled-up (and segmented) center-burning
Estes model rocket engines, and therefore have a hard time envisioning the
juncture between the solid fuel element and the nozzle assembly: The flexible
joint between the fuel element and the nozzle must encompass some truly
amazing materials science, since the geometry of the bottom of the combustion
plenum will be changing (enlarging) as the fuel element burns out toward the
perimeter of the SRB body . . . these monkey-men certainly are clever . . .
Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<gburch@lockeliddell.com>
Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
"Civilization is protest against nature;
progress requires us to take control of evolution."
-- Thomas Huxley
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:42 MST