Re: IA vs. AI was: longevity vs singularity

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Fri Jul 30 1999 - 09:05:33 MDT


Eugene Leitl wrote:
>
> Eliezer S. Yudkowsky writes:
>
> > synchronization, what *I* will be doing with distributed.net will -
> > hell, even Eugene Leitl's genetic algorithm would Transcend at that
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Hah! *That* is coming from a conservative-AI believer boy!
>
> > point. Douglas Lenat could just rerun EURISKO. *Spreadsheet* programs

I don't know if this is some kind of deranged running gag, or Eugene is
running multiple versions, all of whom need separate explanations, but,
for the record, yet again: I do not believe in conservative AI. Not
everyone who refuses to believe in neural networks believes in
conservative AI. The people who've been doing AI over the last fifty
years, and have partitioned it into classical and connectionist, did not
exactly exhaust the problem space. Classical and connectionist AI are
simply two sides of the same coin.

-- 
           sentience@pobox.com          Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
        http://pobox.com/~sentience/tmol-faq/meaningoflife.html
Running on BeOS           Typing in Dvorak          Programming with Patterns
Voting for Libertarians   Heading for Singularity   There Is A Better Way


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:36 MST