Re: Re. (...) Economic Role of Manned Space Stations

From: Doug Jones (random@qnet.com)
Date: Wed Jul 21 1999 - 13:33:13 MDT


The shuttle plus payload is around 100 tons in orbit; delta-v to get
to lunar orbit is about 4.5 km/s total. With LOX/LH2 at Isp of 455,
the mass ratio needed would be about 2.9, requiring 190 tons of
propellants not counting tankage and engines.

Since shuttle payloads are max about 25 tons, this would require
eight launches just for the propellants- only to deliver 25 tons of
usable payload to lunar orbit. It would be far cheaper to develop
new vehicles from scratch rather than transport a shuttle to lunar
orbit.

If you want to return the shuttle to earth, it gets even uglier.

The best near-term way to get large payloads to the moon would be to
use Ariane 5 vehicles to put up a bunch of stages in LEO, dock them
together, then drop stages as needed along the way. Cheaper, and
little new machinery need be designed.

paul@i2.to wrote:
> Yikes Spike! Certainly not. What I was suggesting is that
> you strap some kind of inter-orbital transfer booster on
> after it has achieved LEO. The delta-V necessary to get to
> LEO is already (4/5?) the amount necessary to get to lunar
> orbit and back. So I'd imagine these inter-orbital boosters
> would not have to be nearly as big or dramatic as the
> solid-rocket boosters used on takeoff.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul

--
Doug Jones, Freelance Rocket Plumber


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:32 MST