From: Spike Jones (spike66@ibm.net)
Date: Sun Jul 18 1999 - 16:42:43 MDT
> Which category is that, Spike? Mr. Celibate?
Oops I realized after the fact that I could have accidentally
caused a misunderstanding. Natasha did not write the above
line, I did. I was attempting a little self-deprecating humor. {8^D
Had she wrote it, I would have laughed, but she is more serious
minded than that I fear.
Thats my problem: I dont care if people are laughing with me
or laughing at me, so long as they laugh.
Natasha Vita-More wrote:
> 1) Poor Sap: ...a sex coach, etc. could turn this type into a new category...
A sex coach? Seriously? I have never heard of such a thing. {8^D
> ...Self-improvement is very extropian, and if it is sex you want...
Well, actually it was an academic interest. I would like to see
Mr. Brains produce far more offspring, however, for the sake
of the human and transhuman kind.
> then become a visual enticement. I might add here that most women
> are far more attracted to someone who has style than a pretty face.
Uh oh. {8-[ Im on caloric restriction and consequently Im cold
all the time, even in a 74F room. So, I wear wool business suits.
Always. Its not a pretty sight... {8-[
> Regardless, I get what you are saying and I'd add another
> type which would be Mr. Caring-&-Generous. He would get the gal.
I put Caring&Generous in the brains category. {8-] spike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:30 MST