Re: Re. SPACE: Economic Role for Manned Space Stations

From: Spike Jones (spike66@ibm.net)
Date: Sun Jul 18 1999 - 09:46:29 MDT


> > Alintelbot@aol.com wrote: the Shuttle, as a design and as a concept,
> > is increasingly inefficient. What's fascinating is that there's no real
> > reason we couldn't be going beyond Earth orbit with it after some
> retrofitting.

Well, after some *really profound* retrofitting, perhaps, such as taking off
the wings. And wheels. And redesigning the rest of it to be lighter and
carry more fuel. Better yet, keep the solids and the external tank, and
start all over on the design of the orbitter, use it as a never-return vehicle.
Or, consider Bob Zubrin's notion of a shuttle Z and an Ares, mentioned
on page 62 of his book The Case for Mars. After I did the numbers on
his space trucks, they look like a really good bet for what you propose.
spike



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:30 MST