From: amiel fernandez (chinte21@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 12 1999 - 10:02:56 MDT
Personally, the thought that human beings are the most intelligent beings in
the whole universe sounds so inane and frightening that I remember thinking
"There HAS got to be something smarter than us!" To think that human beings
are the highest intelligence around seems to be the highest sort of
arrogance and as there is a countless range of intelligent power beneath
human beings, there would seem to be the same range above us. You may think
that there is a limit to the sky, but you will find out as you go up that
there is something beyond the blue and it is nothing like you are used to.
Amiel
>From: Rob Harris Cen-IT <Rob.Harris@bournemouth.gov.uk>
>Reply-To: extropians@extropy.com
>To: "'extropians@extropy.com'" <extropians@extropy.com>
>Subject: SI's/gods
>Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:56:08 +0100
>
>Yet there is no stronger philosophical argument today to look for
>explanations in intelligent aliens than there was 500 years ago.
>
>There is, and they didn't decide upon "intelligent aliens" 500 years ago,
>they decided upon "Gods", two very different concepts. Confusing them will
>shut your eyes to the possibility of SI influence on natural laws.
>
>The stronger philosophical argument comes from our newfound knowledge of
>the
>structure and composition of the universe. We are on a planet. We more
>than
>likely arose from this planet alone. Therefore it is probably possible in
>this universe for lifeforms to arise directly from the presence of a
>suitable planet. There are a squillion and one planets. Fill in the rest
>yourself.
>
>What I am saying is that they didn't have this knowledge from which to make
>philosophical inferences 500 years ago, in fact, most religions would set
>out that Humans are the only species as advanced as we are in the whole of
>eternity, and ours is the only planet - minus the God(s). Therefore,
>reaching decisions concerning Gods was a prerequisite. Not so now. We can
>actually postulate the existence of SI's based upon real scientifically
>collected data as in the the simple logic trail above.
>
>Rob.
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
>the system manager.
>
>This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
>MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
>
>www.bournemouth.gov.uk
>**********************************************************************
>
>
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:28 MST