Cold Fusion

From: John Clark (jonkc@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Fri Jul 09 1999 - 09:29:59 MDT


----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert J. Bradbury <bradbury@aeiveos.com> Wrote:

>Cold fusion is still a very questionable phenomena and there is no
>evidence that it can be scaled into something useful.

There is a type of cold fusion that definitely works, even as cold as 13
degrees Kelvin; but there hasn't been much happening in muon-catalyzed
cold fusion lately, and it's a shame because the idea seems so elegant.
A negative muon is almost identical to an electron except it's 207 times as
massive, you can even substitute them for electrons in Hydrogen and the result
is atoms and molecules 207 times smaller than normal. In all fusion reactions you
need to get the nucleus of 2 atoms so close that the short range nuclear forces
can take over, this is not easy to do because the nucleus of both atoms have a
positive charge and so repel each other. In normal fusion you use brute force to
do this, things get very hot and so the two slam together, if you use muons instead
of electrons in a hydrogen molecule the two nuclei are already 207 times closer
together even when ice cold.

There are problems of course, it takes energy to make a muon, to break even
each muon would have to catalyze between 100 and 500 fusion reactions, and
muons are not stable, their half life is 2*10^-6 seconds, but a lot can happen
in two microseconds, that's a very long time by particle physics standards.
I know of no fundamental reason it couldn't be made to work someday.

>Fusion produces neutrons, neutrons have this nasty property
>that they go through things and require a lot of shielding. They
>also make materials radioactive.

Not all fusion reactions produce neutrons. The fusion reaction between non radioactive
deuterium (Hydrogen 2) and non radioactive Helium 3 produces non radioactive Helium 4,
an easily controlled proton, 18.3 mev of energy, and most important of all, no neutrons.
Unfortunately you need a higher temperature to achieve it than the deuterium tritium reaction
most are talking about. Also, there is not much Helium 3 on the Earth, although there is
probably a lot of it that could be mined on comets and on the ice moons of the outer planets.

   John K Clark jonkc@att.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.5

iQA/AwUBN4YUwN+WG5eri0QzEQIrAwCg/zLIiBy6zdW0TqbaGm+2jTVJr9wAoJco
vGPzZsf2oiGTDJhOXMiooH3H
=rbkN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:26 MST