From: Jason Spencer (spencer@ualberta.ca)
Date: Mon Jul 05 1999 - 02:00:40 MDT
>>Elizabeth Childs wonders:
>>
>>> ...if we don't have some aesthetic memory of the dinosaurs...
>>
>>We dont. Missed em by several tens of millions of years. However,
>>if the ancients found dinosaur skeletons, they would be at a loss to
>>explain them. Perhaps the flood legend recorded in the book of
>>Genesis came from finding fossils of sea creatures on mountainsides,
>>and the dinosaur legends were spawned by the discovery
>>of a t-rex skeleton? spike
>
>Seems pretty unlikely that the ancients would have found a T-Rex skeleton
>complete enough to give them any idea of what the animal would have looked
>like when alive, or indeed any dinosaur skeleton that would have let them
>understand that they were looking at the remains of a lizard-like creature.
It has been suggested that early gargoyle statues were modeled after
_Protoceratops_. They are smaller and more robust than T-rex as well as
being much more abundant. Their head plates are often preserved in one
piece and can look quite lizard-like without extensive reconstruction.
So, has anyone seen any gargoyles that look sufficiently Protoceratopsian
that might add credence to this claim?
-Jason
-- Jason Spencer spencer@ualberta.ca http://www.ualberta.ca/~spencer/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:23 MST