From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Fri Jun 25 1999 - 19:04:26 MDT
At 10:34 PM 6/24/99 -0700, Lee Daniel wrote:
> I don't hold that belief, nor do I respect that
>belief, but I respect even less the desire to deny unpleasant
>realities. You may speculate all you want as to my motives--I
>believe that facts are more important than motives. If you think
>I have my facts wrong, then say so and tell me why.
The speculation was yours, and I fed it back to you.
I do think that the basis in this particular thread for which you are apply
your facts is wrong.
First, it a generalization that "American" men perceive women as a "whole"
in the context Rob stated, because if so then we must include our mothers,
sisters, daughters as well as the women who perform services with and to
males, such as business associates, physicians and counselors, architects,
technicians, engineers, and any of the other lines of service as
superficial masquerading minds.
Second, it is not accurately an "insult" for women for the type of male who
considers women to be superficial, because they can make a pretty good
living as being conceived as such.
Making a pretty good living being conceived as such means that they are
making monetary profits. The fact that they make a pretty good living at
it means that they place more emphasis on the monetary gains than suffering
a psychological "insult" from how they are making a living by taking
advantage of the situation and reaping profits from it.
Thirdly, and lastly, we might as Rob to play fair and deal his deck of
cards on the table. Rob?
Cheers!
Natasha
Natasha Vita-More: http://www.natasha.cc
Transhumanist Art Centre - Home of Extropic Art: http://www.extropic-art.com
**NEW** Transhuman Culture InfoMark: http://www.transhuman.org
PRESS RELEASE: "We are transhumans ..." Meme Orbits Saturn in 2004!
Biotech Futures: Challenges of Life Extension and Genetic Engineering
http://www.extropy.org/ex4/e4main.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:18 MST