Re: freedom vs even distribution

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Fri Jun 11 1999 - 07:38:35 MDT


Cynthia <cyn386@flash.net> writes:

> Dan Clemmensen wrote:
>
> > I think that the conclusion overlooks the likelihood of altruism
> > among the potential immortals. If even one of the immortals has
> > even the slightest amount of altruism, then the technology will
> > be be disseminated to the populace as a whole. The argument against
> > this assumes a zero-sum game in which a gain by the unwashed masses
> > equates to a loss by an immortal. Information doesn't work this
> > way.
>
> It may very well be possible that the average person will not be able to
> handle the enhancements necessary to become 'immortal'.

This is the problem of Bank's Culture novels: the Culture could rush
in with super-AI, nanomachines, matter-energy conversion, genetic
engineering and a lot of wonderful stuff to neighboring but less
developed civilizations, but that would not work since they could not
handle the technology or would become just poor imitations of the
Culture. So it has to sneak developmens in, ideally let the
civilizations make their advancments themselves but help them around
dangerous pitfalls (which of course in itself is tremendously hard to
do - this is really what produces most of the plot in the novels).

Also, not every human might want to reach the highest levels of
transcendence. I know several who might settle for living like Greek
Gods.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:07 MST