From: Brian Atkins (brian@posthuman.com)
Date: Wed Jun 09 1999 - 17:22:34 MDT
Eugene Leitl wrote:
>
> mark@unicorn.com writes:
>
> > 8086 and pushing up performance while bolting on a few new bits here and
> > there, but as far as I remember Merced was supposed to be out already, and
> > even their new core logic chips seem to be well behind (e.g. see
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/990608-000022.html). Of course there's no
> > particular technical reason for the new chips, so maybe they can drop them
> > and push the 80x86 up to multi-gigahertz clock rates.
>
> Oh, but there is. These gate delays add up after a while. One needs to
> streamline/radically simplify the architecture to go to higher clock
> rates. Structure shrink alone can't do it forever, you know.
>
> I think Merced architecture is stale already well before it has become
> available. The Sony Playstation 2 graphics synthesizer seems to be the
> only truly innovative hardware design I am currently aware of. The
> Xilinx people need some watching, as well.
Something else to note is that AMD may finally be able to
beat Intel performance with the new K7 series of chips due
out this month. They were designed by some of the people
that worked on the Alphas, and are definitely designed to
scale to high clock rates. And the motherboards may be
able to support up to 14 CPUs eventually, each with dedicated
memory access.
As for combining mem and CPUs together, I am not sure if
that will prevail. There are optical motherboard bus
technologies being developed that may eliminate that
bottleneck, and leave the flexibility of having separate
upgradable components.
-- Join the ExI/>H SETI team today: http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_show&id=393------------------------------------------------------------------- "It IS possible." - Vincent, _Gattaca_
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:05 MST