From: den Otter (neosapient@geocities.com)
Date: Wed Jun 09 1999 - 04:42:09 MDT
----------
> From: Anders Sandberg <asa@nada.kth.se>
> "den Otter" <neosapient@geocities.com> writes:
>
> > > From: Michael S. Lorrey <mike@lorrey.com>
> > > QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's the Star Belly Sneech story.
> > >
> > > One of my favorites. To me it illustrated how stupid the whole race/difference
> > > thing is...
> >
> > Actually, it's stories like this that are stupid; they support the myth that
> > the whole "race/difference thing" is just a matter of some irrelevant
> > exterior features
>
> I don't know about Dr Seuss (BTW, thanks everybody for explaining the
> reference to me), but in my story (if Dr Zuckermann was right) there
> were real differences. But technology can make these differences
> irrelevant or even useful.
True. The question is: will that technology ever become evenly
destributed? Note that while giving everyone an equal opportunity
is fine, it would of course be *very* stupid to intentionally make
some other race "superior". The same goes for artificial "races",
(i.e. AIs) of course.
> Then of course we can start arguing about
> how large the differences are in real life and if they are truly
> relevant compared to other factors;
Well, IMO it's all a matter of percentages; only a relatively small
portion of a race/group is responsible for its success/progress etc,
and for some reason this group has been marginalized in places
like Africa, while in Europe they managed to create a positive
feedback loop which allowed more and more people to realize
their "full" potential, thus fuelling further progress. So what is the key
ingredient here?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:04 MST