From: Brian Atkins (brian@posthuman.com)
Date: Wed Jun 02 1999 - 08:52:19 MDT
I think by the time you might be able to achieve something
that really approaches immortality (just making your body
live for a long time is not what I mean here.. I mean total
immunity to accidents, nukes, planet destruction, etc.), it
won't matter so much. And until something approaching that
level of immortality exists, I think most people will just
consider themselves to have longer than normal lives, but
otherwise still just the same.
On the other hand, I would like it very much if some kind
of "right to life-extension" was added to our constitution
(USA). Sometimes the FDA and other pieces of government
get in the way of things that we want...
"Michael S. Lorrey" wrote:
>
> "Eliezer S. Yudkowsky" wrote:
>
> > We(*) don't think about it anymore, do we? There's something terribly
> > sad about the fact that a race can become so used to death and death and
> > death that it has to be nearby, or spectacular, for it to be a tragedy.
> > To regain your perspective, read this excellent article in The Onion:
> >
> > http://www.theonion.com/onion3521/millions_dead.html
>
> While The Onion can be humerous at times, this is a very sobering satire,
> although I am sure most people will just not get it. This does bring to mind one
> concern I have about immortality: If we acheive it, will we loose the ability to
> defend ourselves with deadly force as a result? If it is seen as common that all
> are immortal, and that immortality is some sort of right, would not imposing
> death of any kind be seen as too excessive to allow as a punishment for a crime
> or for a defense against a criminal in the act. Thoughts, anyone?
>
> Mike Lorrey
-- Join the ExI/>H SETI team today: http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_show&id=393------------------------------------------------------------------- "It IS possible." - Vincent, _Gattaca_
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:56 MST