RE: Oppose AI in crime solving

From: Billy Brown (ewbrownv@mindspring.com)
Date: Tue Jun 01 1999 - 22:22:42 MDT


Eliezer S. Yudkowsky [SMTP:sentience@pobox.com] wrote:
> Do these guys have any idea how easy it is to fool an AI? Even a
> human-equivalent mind wouldn't have any of the defenses humans evolved
> over the generations, and a neural network is deterministically
> misleadable. While I strongly support the development of AI, I
> categorically oppose the use of any AI in social structures; it's just
> too easy to abuse or outright crack. Opaque AI like neural networks is
> even worse.

My understanding is that what they are after is something conceptually
similar to the image-enhancement software the military uses. You feed all
the data you can get your hands on into the program, and it points out
non-obvious connections and/or makes guesses about which suspects (out of a
group of thousands or more) you ought to be investigating. Either way the
AI's output isn't considered evidence - its just a tool to help
investigators sort through mountains of irrelevant data.

Billy Brown
ewbrownv@mindspring.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:55 MST