Re: capicity for violence = less violence? [was Re: Security]

From: Chuck Kuecker (ckuecker@mcs.net)
Date: Tue Jun 01 1999 - 19:24:40 MDT


At 03:18 PM 6/1/99 -0400, Mike Lorrey wrote:
>
>A friend of my father and me is the VP of Sturm Ruger, Inc. His uncle has a
>collection of 25,000 guns (really). My friend is the sole beneficiary of this
>man's Will. How do you propose that my friend can inherit this collection
>legally, even though not one has ever been used in a crime, nor has my friend
>ever commited a crime, and the collection is kept in a sub-basement of a
house
>that has a bank-style combination lock vault door on it???
>

Obviously, this is not a case of someone walking into a gun shop and
ordering 25,000 pistols or rifles. The law, if any, should be so written as
to allow SOME common sense to be used in its' enforcement.

Yeah, I know, dream on. Personally, I don't want anyone telling me how to
spend my money. The insidious thing about all this gun regulation talk is
that it starts to make some views sound palatable on first hearing, until
someone else points out a fallacy. It is easy to assume the worst when
presented with a scenario like multiple gun purchases. I imagine that the
spin doctors do this on purpose to warp more people into their way of
thinking.

Chuck Kuecker



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:55 MST