The politics of biotechnology

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Tue Jun 01 1999 - 08:51:05 MDT


I am reading the latest Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences (www.pnas.org), containing the talks from a conference on
world food supply. A very cheering view really; while there certainly
are some big problems to solve the overall future looks reasonably
bright globally (locally, there might still be plenty of
trouble). However, one factor that appears to be very important for
this to become true is the spread of biotechnology from the North to
the South, and several speakers mentioned the problem of balancing
intellectual property and profit with the need to get bioengineered
crops to the poor countries. The problems appear to be economical and
politicial in this area, not technical. The consensus seemed to be
that what we need to fix food shortages is richer poor countries. Any
ideas for extropian solutions of biotech spread?

This is really an area where the good side of biotech can be
demonstrated. Anybody saying we should not spread genetically modified
organisms better explain how to feed 10 billion people sustainably
otherwise. There are of course problems with some biotechnologies
(such as the risk of Microsoft-like copy-protected crops), but there
is great potential here. One of the most interesting ideas suggested
was to fix vitamin A deficiency by adding carotenoid genes to crops;
in areas where people live mainly of the same food day after day
increases in nutritive value and even the introduction of
vaccination-genes could be very powerful.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg                                      Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se                            http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:55 MST