From: Raymond G. Van De Walker (rgvandewalker@juno.com)
Date: Tue May 25 1999 - 22:21:56 MDT
On 24 May 1999 17:06:47 +0200 Anders Sandberg <asa@nada.kth.se> writes:
>"Raymond G. Van De Walker" <rgvandewalker@juno.com> writes:
>
>> I predict it will be the second thing constructed after a true
>assembler.
>
>I would be surprised, it is after all a sophisticated mechanism
>relying on group cooperation of trillions of foglets, each containing
>nanocomputers, microscale actuators, sensors and
>networking. Obviously, nanocomputers will have to be developed first.
Agreed, but nanocomputers are required for efficient assemblers, and do
not
constitute a new class of invention. Besides, nanocomputers might be
pretty trivial. I think all we really need is a good Verilog compiler
for nano-scale systems, and the computer problem is fixed, to a first
approximation. Motorola can then just compile their current u-controller
source to nanonic form. We will then have nanonic Power PCs. We night
not even need new compilers! Of course later, more optimized processors
are likely, but this would get things moving.
ufog is a distinctly different product, with unique value, and the
possibility to cause major economic and military dislocations.
Significantly, it is _not_ a medical product, and thus does not fall
under medical regulatory laws, which makes it far less risky than most
transhumanizing technologies.
As for cooperation, the obvious way is to have a ufog description
language, analogous to Postscript, maybe some variant of VRML. There's
gobs of foglets, but that means there's gobs of processors, too. One may
as well use them.
By analogy, just think how hard it is to describe all those millions of
dots on the printed page! How could people ever manage it !?
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:48 MST