Re: Submolecular nanotech [WAS: Goals]

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Mon May 24 1999 - 14:44:09 MDT


matt.hood@convergys.com writes:

> Why the separation? Could not the U-fog be designed to have direct contact?

Abrasion. Imagine walking through a world composed of sanding paper,
doing its best to reshape itself to be out of the way but occasionally
failing.

> Nutrients could be absorbed directly through the skin
> and mucous membranes to eliminate the need for eating.

The skin is a rather good barrier, so you cannot get much
in. Nutrients through the mucous membranes might work, but I doubt the
permeability is good enough to allow more than a trickle. But maybe
one could have edible foglets, and when you are hungry you just
swallow the air...

> At the other end of
> the spectrum, bodily wastes would be absorbed as they
> are released by the U-fog.

Hmm, the fog toilet? I'm not sure I want to pursue this train of
thought to its logical conclusions :-)

> The U-fog would also be a breathing medium that
> adjusted itself as required to supply oxygen at times of peak activity.

Another nice thing: it could control dust and bacteria fairly well.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg                                      Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se                            http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:48 MST