Re: Submolecular nanotech

From: Dan Clemmensen (Dan@Clemmensen.ShireNet.com)
Date: Thu May 20 1999 - 19:45:01 MDT

• Next message: Steve Tucker: "Re: Enhanced Senses"
• Previous message: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: Provocation error - peculiar conclusion."
• In reply to: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: Submolecular nanotech"
• Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Submolecular nanotech"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

"O'Regan, Emlyn" wrote:
>
> >
> >I agree 11%
> >Gina "Nanogirl" Miller
>
> I'm confused 56.7%
> Emlyn

96.5% of all extropians make up their own statistics :-)

• Next message: Steve Tucker: "Re: Enhanced Senses"
• Previous message: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: Provocation error - peculiar conclusion."
• In reply to: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: Submolecular nanotech"
• Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Submolecular nanotech"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:46 MST