From: Billy Brown (bbrown@conemsco.com)
Date: Tue May 11 1999 - 13:28:29 MDT
david_musick wrote:
> Mark, I don't think you realize how easily others can lead you around by
> your desires (like dangling a carrot in front of a donkey). You are
actually
> quite helpless to resist those who offer you what you want.
Do you realize how condescending this statement is? In one breathless wave
of an arm you relegate all the thoughts, skills and feelings of another mind
to the category of "mindless idiots that I can easily manipulate". And you
wonder why others react to you with hostility??
> My utopia is all about helping everyone achieve what they really want.
No, it is about helping everyone achieve what *you* think they ought to
want. You don't know what *I* want, and you aren't going to - which is the
key to understanding why freedom works, and other systems don't.
You seem, however, to have some serious misconceptions about the basic terms
of this discussion:
> We can choose to live in the world we want. By being kind, we choose to
live in a world where people are kind.
One of the most fundamental issues you need to face is that different people
will make different choices about what kind of world they want to live in.
If you want a society that actually works, you need to allow for that.
One of the most pernicious implications of this fact is the inevitability of
violence. The more kind, loving and peaceful your society becomes, the more
tempting a target it will be for those who care only about themselves. Any
society must therefore choose between being helpless in the face of
aggression, being armed and encouraging self-defense, or completely
destroying individuality in an attempt to eradicate potential criminals.
The same dynamic also operates on the scale of nations, which is why the
only countries that don't have armies are the ones that are so weak they
have no possible hope of defending themselves.
> There is a finite amount of accessible natural resources on
> Earth, but there is plenty to provide all humans with a very comfortable
> living situation, with current technology.
Yes, it can. But a "comfortable living situation" means different things to
different people. There is an infinite variety of ways in which we could
spend our finite resources - on food, clothing, education, art,
transportation, tools, toys, and on and on. The key question in any society
is: Who decides which of these things we actually get?
The beauty of a pure free market is that the answer will always be "you do".
If you want lots of material goods, you can work long hours and accumulate
the money to buy them. If you are more interested in leisure, you can adopt
a low-income lifestyle and work part time. You can spend money on whatever
happens to interest you, and ignore everything else.
In every other system man has devised, there is some other person who makes
these decisions for you. The government (or the collective, or the town
council, or whatever) decides for you - and they will almost never decide
the way you wanted them to.
Now, it is entirely possible that a society of SIs will come up with some
arcane social organization that makes this whole debate irrelevant. But for
any society inhabited by minds that we can understand, the fundamental
issues remain the same.
BTW - This seems like a good place to point out that, by any objective
measure, there are no free-market societies on Earth. The entire Western
world is properly described as socialist, and the rest of the planet ranges
from socialism to a whole gamut of autocratic systems. Even the least
socialist of these countries have licensing and zoning laws, selective
tariffs, employer-employee relations laws, and all manner of other
infringements on the market.
Many of the things you bemoan in your initial post - "those who demand
obedience and conformity", "those who demand that I sacrifice my own
happiness to
accomplish their goals", "traditions of dominance and violence" - are
actually antithetical to pure capitalism. This is because a truly free
market can only exist in a context of individual freedom, where everyone is
allowed to make their own decisions and run their own lives as they see fit.
It is the quest for a socialist utopia that leads to conformity, violence,
and the sacrifice of the individual.
Billy Brown, MCSE+I
bbrown@conemsco.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:42 MST