Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

From: Spike Jones (spike66@ibm.net)
Date: Sat Apr 24 1999 - 10:48:36 MDT


Scott Badger wrote:

> Eliezer wrote:
> ...
> > "these terms aren't very well-defined, sounds like more New Age
> psychobabble".
> >
>
> Once again, this instrument has been used by respected academicians in
> hundreds of studies that have appeared in scores of peer-reviewed journals.

Amazing. Seems like it would seriously reduce the credibility of the paper.

> No one is saying that's how it should be, and only
> you appear outraged.

Hmmmm. Outrage. Masculine trait. {8^D
Kidding! Bygones. spike



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:37 MST