Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

From: GBurch1@aol.com
Date: Fri Apr 23 1999 - 14:14:32 MDT

Next message: Brian D Williams: "Re: Laser as reactionless propulsion"
Previous message: Gina Miller: "RE: Suicide cells"
Maybe in reply to: James Rogers: "Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 99-04-23 15:54:25 EDT, lcrocker@mercury.colossus.net
(none) (Lee Daniel Crocker) wrote:

> > From GBurch1@aol.com Fri Apr 23 12:39:01 1999
> >
> > Feminine: 4.000
> > Masculine: 5.950
> >
> > too much testosterone?
>
> Isn't that a requirement for a lawyer?

You wanna make something of it, buddy? Just kidding . . .

        Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<gburch@lockeliddell.com>
     Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
        http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
                         "Civilization is protest against nature;
                  progress requires us to take control of evolution."
                                      -- Thomas Huxley

Next message: Brian D Williams: "Re: Laser as reactionless propulsion"
Previous message: Gina Miller: "RE: Suicide cells"
Maybe in reply to: James Rogers: "Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:37 MST