Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lcrocker@mercury.colossus.net)
Date: Fri Apr 23 1999 - 13:53:34 MDT

Next message: GBurch1@aol.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Previous message: Alejandro Dubrovsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
In reply to: GBurch1@aol.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Next in thread: Spike Jones: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> From GBurch1@aol.com Fri Apr 23 12:39:01 1999
>
> Feminine: 4.000
> Masculine: 5.950
>
> too much testosterone?

Isn't that a requirement for a lawyer?

--
Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html>
"All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past,
are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified
for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC

Next message: GBurch1@aol.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Previous message: Alejandro Dubrovsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
In reply to: GBurch1@aol.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Next in thread: Spike Jones: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:37 MST