Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

From: Alejandro Dubrovsky (s335984@student.uq.edu.au)
Date: Fri Apr 23 1999 - 13:35:01 MDT

• Next message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Previous message: EWyatt794@aol.com: "Re: Gender Importance"
• In reply to: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Strange, i seem to be the only feminine member of the group:

Femininity = 4.600
Masculinity = 3.450

"You are sex-typed in the feminine direction"

chau
Alejandro "Getting-In-Touch-With-My-Feminine-Side" Dubrovsky

• Next message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Previous message: EWyatt794@aol.com: "Re: Gender Importance"
• In reply to: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:37 MST