RE: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

From: Billy Brown (bbrown@conemsco.com)
Date: Fri Apr 23 1999 - 12:02:03 MDT

• Next message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Previous message: david_musick@juno.com: "I Have Returned to the List"
• In reply to: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: k-hat@juno.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Reply: k-hat@juno.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>>http://transsexual.org/bem.html

Feminine 4.1
Masculine 5.8

"You are sex typed in the masculine direction."

No big surprise there. :-)

Billy Brown, MCSE+I
bbrown@conemsco.com
 

• Next message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Previous message: david_musick@juno.com: "I Have Returned to the List"
• In reply to: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: k-hat@juno.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Reply: k-hat@juno.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:37 MST