Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

From: Scott Badger (wbadger@psyberlink.net)
Date: Fri Apr 23 1999 - 11:17:54 MDT

Next message: david_musick@juno.com: "I Have Returned to the List"
Previous message: Scott Badger: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
In reply to: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Next in thread: Alejandro Dubrovsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Curt Adams wrote:

> >http://transsexual.org/bem.html
>
> Femininity Score is 4.450
>
> Masculinity Score is 4.150
>
> sex-typed in neither direction
>
> However, I have always thought of myself as and extrememly beta male,
> rather than androgynous.

I may be mistaken, but I think that "sex-typed in neither direction"
represents the Undifferentiated Type. Doesn't it explicitly say
"Androgynous" if that is the result?

Scott

Next message: david_musick@juno.com: "I Have Returned to the List"
Previous message: Scott Badger: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
In reply to: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Next in thread: Alejandro Dubrovsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:37 MST