Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

From: CurtAdams@aol.com
Date: Fri Apr 23 1999 - 10:27:53 MDT

• Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Previous message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Maybe in reply to: James Rogers: "Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: Scott Badger: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Reply: Scott Badger: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Reply: Alejandro Dubrovsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>http://transsexual.org/bem.html

Femininity Score is 4.450
            
Masculinity Score is 4.150

sex-typed in neither direction

However, I have always thought of myself as and extrememly beta male,
rather than androgynous.

• Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Previous message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Maybe in reply to: James Rogers: "Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: Scott Badger: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Reply: Scott Badger: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Reply: Alejandro Dubrovsky: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:37 MST