Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

From: Damien Broderick (damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Fri Apr 23 1999 - 12:04:00 MDT

• Next message: Eric Ruud: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "Re: What are we going to do about all the space junk?"
• In reply to: Scott Badger: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>http://transsexual.org/bem.html

Hmm

Femininity Score is 1.950
Masculinity Score is 5.100
                                                               
sex-typed in the masculine direction.
                                       
Damien Broderick

• Next message: Eric Ruud: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "Re: What are we going to do about all the space junk?"
• In reply to: Scott Badger: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:37 MST