Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

From: Gina Miller (echoz@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 22 1999 - 19:39:01 MDT

• Next message: Gina Miller: "Re: Nanorgasm"
• Previous message: Gina Miller: "Re: Nanorgasm"
• Maybe in reply to: James Rogers: "Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: Jocelyn Brown: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Eric wrote
>If you're arguing that there are two options here (male gender or
female
>gender), you need to look at some cultures that have more than two
genders.

I respond:
I am curious as to the cultures that have more than two genders?

Gina "Nanogirl" Miller
Nanotechnology Industries
Web Page
http://www.nanoindustries.com
E-mail
echoz@hotmail.com
Alternate E-mail
nanogirl@halcyon.com
 
"The science of nanotechnology, solutions for the future."
 

_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

• Next message: Gina Miller: "Re: Nanorgasm"
• Previous message: Gina Miller: "Re: Nanorgasm"
• Maybe in reply to: James Rogers: "Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Next in thread: Jocelyn Brown: "Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:36 MST