Re: ethical problem? Some kind of problem, anyway...

From: Michael S. Lorrey (mike@lorrey.com)
Date: Mon Apr 19 1999 - 07:25:55 MDT


"Michael S. Lorrey" wrote:

> O'Regan, Emlyn wrote:
> >
> > aargghh, I don't think I'll get to use cryonics because I'm getting
> > cremated here.
> >
> > I didn't express myself overly well, sorry for wasting everyone's time.
> >
> > What I meant was that, psychologically, cryonics feels like arranging
> > your own funeral. I support using cryonics, I think its a good last
> > option, but to actually address it in your life must be like arranging
> > your own burial site.
> >
> > Or is it like getting life insurance?
> >
>
> Much more like getting life insurance. Failing to do so is insuring that
> you WILL have a funeral, which is kind of a morbid type of laziness.
> Now, making up invitations to your own suspension celebration ahead of
> time I think indicates you may need to talk to someone...

This being said, I am 31 and I have not signed up for cryonic suspension. My rationalization for this act of pure laziness and/or stinginess is that according to the stats, if I die in the next two decades it is most likely to be something which leaves my brain in a useless state, and anything else that happens is likely to give me plenty of a heads up that I will have time to sign up for suspension before it kills me. Cryonics is a last ditch option, which IMHO is most likely to be used by the oldsters on the list than the youngsters. Caveat: I will probably sign up sometime in the next ten years anyways if I wind up having a wife and kids that will make it much more worthwhile to come back to.

Now, if anyone can disabuse me of my current rationalizations...I would appreciate it...

Mike Lorrey



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:34 MST