Re: Parts is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))

From: Bryan Moss (bryan.moss@dial.pipex.com)
Date: Fri Mar 26 1999 - 07:31:33 MST


I actually meant parts in a small musical I'll be producing shortly after
becoming a Power... if I could think of a relevant name this could be
*really* amusing.

BM

Michael M. Butler wrote:

> I was talking about *HIM*, not you. :)
>
> That is to say, "mostly just for parts" meant "mostly
> just for your component parts, viz. atoms".
>
> "Ah HA! PRONOUN TROUBLE!!!" -- D. Duck
>
> At 20:58 99.03.25 -0500, you wrote:
> >Michael M. Butler wrote:
> >
> > > I think he means "atoms", not "organs".
> > >
> > > >Pointless. Parts can be grown,
> > >
> > > > > mostly just for parts.
> > > > >
> > > > > BM
> >
> >No, I meant organs, synthetic organs.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:23 MST