Re: PHIL: Is it ethical to create special purpose sentients?

From: Ron Kean (ronkean@juno.com)
Date: Thu Mar 04 1999 - 02:00:37 MST


On Tue, 2 Mar 1999 22:05:07 EST Delvieron@aol.com writes:

...

 Is it okay to enslave something so long as it is
>doesn't
>understand and/or desire freedom?

There is no obvious answer. Our culture frowns on gratuitous cruelty to
animals, but accepts slavery of animals. Even cruelty is accepted if it
is for a worthwhile purpose such as medical research, safety research, or
product development and testing.

Or maybe it is wrong to have
>domesticated
>animals, making them serve our whims and needs, linking them to us
>through
>breeding them into a perpetual childlike state, and "putting down"
>any >domestic that goes "feral".

Various domestic animals are intentionally or unintentionally selectively
bred for characteristics we value, but it is difficult to 'blame' any
particular individual for that, since the process takes so long, and most
pet owners do not even do that intentionally. It is understandable that
the average person would prefer a domestic cat as a pet over a bobcat or
a rat.

Ferrets have become somewhat popular as pets even though there is no
lengthy history of them being kept and bred. Cats, in contrast, have
been kept for 5,000 years, and dogs for longer.

Ron Kean

.

.

.

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:14 MST