From: ASpidle@aol.com
Date: Thu Feb 25 1999 - 08:53:44 MST
In a message dated 99-02-25 10:16:29 EST, you write:
Useful for feeling good and evading hard answers perhaps but it is rather
unusual that making a symbol have 8-billion definitions makes it useful for
anything at all.
Definitions are the sine qua none of understanding: they are the only proof
that we have an understanding.
I agree with you here.
It is for us when your spirituality convinces you
that we are blasphemers. It is for you again if another religionist decides
that your God is competing with hers.
Why be so defensive to religionists? Atheists and other idealogues (such as
Hitler and Stalin) also do these bad things.
Actually, the one person whom i respect most on this list (not
saying who) is also the person whom i would predict would be the most kind
and for whom I would, never having met them, do most anything. I recall also
that the person on this list some years ago who struck me as most intensely
critical was also the most objectively kind.
Why not say who it is? Can't we let people know it when we admire them? Is
this reticense an extropian meme?
I guess that what I am saying is that critical capacity and affect are not
only not opponents of one another (which no-one here has implied) but
neither are they even particularly separable elements when analyzed at an
introspective level (of course they are somewhat separable
neuropsychologically, but then we are talking about dozens of computational
modules processing such diverse things theory-of-mind, affective
representations of others versus self and in fact a plethora of highly
interesting, separable affective-cognitions).
Well said.
My feeling from watching this list is that some of its members are among the
most wonderful affective and intellectual company I have ever experienced
and that the two feed elements each other quite wonderfully.
tim
Great posting, Tim.
Adrian Spidle
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-extropians@extropy.com>
Received: from rly-za04.mx.aol.com (rly-za04.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.100])
by air-za01.mail.aol.com (v56.28) with SMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 10:16:28 -0500
Received: from maxwell.kumo.com (kumo.com [198.161.199.205])
by rly-za04.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id KAA10880;
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 10:16:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by maxwell.kumo.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA04589
for extropians-outgoing; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 08:14:25 -0700
Message-Id: <199902251209.XAA15568@karri.bhs.mq.edu.au>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 4.5 (0410)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:09:19 +1100
Subject: Re: Is There A Need for Transhuman Spirituality?
From: "Timothy Bates" <tbates@karri.bhs.mq.edu.au>
To: extropians@extropy.com
Mime-version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-extropians@extropy.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: extropians@extropy.com
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:08 MST