From: CurtAdams@aol.com
Date: Mon Feb 22 1999 - 10:40:03 MST
In a message dated 2/22/99 12:59:11 AM, tbates@karri.bhs.mq.edu.au wrote:
>John Clark said
>
>>Tim Bates tbates@karri.bhs.mq.edu.au Wrote:
>>>The enormous bulk of this cost is for regulatory compliance and
>>>marketing
>>>Ditch the regulations and hte cost is minimal
>>
>>I hate the FDA as much as anyone but that is a huge exaggeration.
>
>I wonder if we could get some facts and figures on this? I will try and
>do some research on line.
Samuel Peltzmann wrote a book on this in the early 70's called "The
Regulation of Pharmaceutical Innovation" or something like that. He
concludes that the FDA increases the cost of pharmaceutical innovation
but pharmaceutical innovation does have other substantial costs. I
can't find my copy for an exact quote. From working in the medical
device industry, I can tell you that regulatory compliance is a large
portion of the costs, probably even the majority, but there are
*definitely* expensive elements to medical device development other
than regulatory requirements.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:07 MST