Re: Y2K silliness

From: Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@together.net)
Date: Fri Feb 12 1999 - 13:59:48 MST


Paul Hughes wrote:

> "Michael S. Lorrey" wrote:
>
> > As Vietnam proved, an aircraft carrier is of absolutely no use against a
> > rural, grassroots insurgency force. The proper equipment for the job. The only
> > way they will be able to control things if they are stupid enough to try to
> > take over is to use chemical and biological weapons...
>
> I think your right Mike. But also consider that there are plenty of very bright
> chemists capable of making something really nasty themselves - like Sarin Gas -
> the stuff used in the Tokyo subway incident. One cc. of pure Sarin in aerosol
> form could easily kill a medium sized city. If one of these chemists or his
> associates call's up the big-bad-boys-of-martial-law and tells them that they
> either return the power back to the people or face continued and random sarin gas
> attacks in vital areas, you'd quickly get a stalemate situation.
>
> When you have large amounts of military personnel wandering the streets never
> knowing whether a Sarin gas attack could happen anytime, it will do much to
> disrupt morale and the cohesiveness of a martial law regime.
>

The problem isn't so much that, but that the gummint would stage such an attack on a
rioting population i.e. south central LA or The DC ghetto/welfare island, then blame
it on right wing 'terrorists' as an excuse to come down on the rest of the country
with 'justification'.

Mike Lorrey



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:02 MST