Re: is information the bottom line?

From: J. Eric Mortensen (eric@episteme.no)
Date: Fri Feb 12 1999 - 10:25:54 MST


Hello everyone, this seems to be a good time to come out of my transhumanist closet:

>I certainly believe it is valuable to investigate the tolerance limits of the so called laws of nature.
>For example playing with different values of universal constants to see which ones can support a viable
>universe and which cant - this helps us to understand the relationships between them. However this does
>not, nor will it ever explain WHY the universe exists - it only tells us HOW.

This seems to me to be certainly false.

Will you not agree that some day we may discover that

1) the universe was created by some entity and that we in some way might ask it
   why it did so?

2) if we discover that our universe was created by accident, that that constitutes an
answer to the question of 'Why?'.

Regards,

Eric

J. Eric Mortensen, eric@episteme.no



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:02 MST