From: Spike Jones (spike66@ibm.net)
Date: Wed Feb 10 1999 - 02:03:11 MST
> >even if it is expendable, we can manufacture the things by
> >the zillions and still get payload to orbit for less than 5k$/kg. spike
> Randall Randall wrote:
> Notice, as well, that the target price for the roton is 2.2k$/kg,
> less than half of the price you mention. Cost is the major factor
> for many industries...
randall, i saw on their site the target price and i hope they
can make something like that happen, but... i fear the roton
folks are taking a promising technology and overpromising
it. {8-[ i see the scientific american article has all the elements:
true single stage to orbit with reentry system and full reusability.
by promising all that, they cause investors to be disappointed
if it falls short, even tho it is quite an impressive achievement
just to make true single stage to orbit.
for those who are interested in our future in space, please
check out that article and comment on which system looks
the most promising. that outfit in kirkland washington with
the k1 two stage to orbit and full reusability looks like the
best bet to me.
the article mentions using bucky tubes to make a geosynchronous
cable to the deck, but no mention is made of the biggest
show stopper with that scheme, even if we manage the materials
problem: every satellite crosses the equatorial plane twice
each orbit. several years ago i calculated the probability of a
collision at 45% per year. {8-[ i suspect that estimate is
low. such a thing might be possible on mars however, as
it turns a bit faster and has less mass than the earth, and
fewer artificial satellites. spike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:01 MST