Re: Spam

From: EvMick@aol.com
Date: Wed Feb 03 1999 - 09:13:08 MST


In a message dated 2/3/99 12:16:33 AM Central Standard Time,
wolfkin@freedomspace.net writes:

> The cost could
> be trivial by most standards, yet quite high for spammers (at
> least on a level with junk mail).

Now there's something.

I like it. And it would definitely shut the toliet seat on porn spam.

EvMick
Portage Indiana



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:59 MST