From: den Otter (neosapient@geocities.com)
Date: Wed Feb 03 1999 - 04:23:20 MST
----------
> From: Anders Sandberg <asa@nada.kth.se>
> Ian Goddard <Ian@Goddard.net> writes:
>
> > Why do we die?
> >
> > Maybe because a steady flow of new people is the only way
> > for new social structures, paradigms, and ideas to evolve,
> > which may in turn maximize the chance of the survival of life.
Actually we aren't "programmed" for long life because it isn't
necessary. To be successful, a creature has to remain alive
and reasonably fit long enough to produce (and in the case
of humans raise) offspring, then it becomes expendable.
In fact, our apparent approx. 120 yr limit is already something
of an overkill, as most individuals would be long dead before
reaching such an age due to accidents and disease.
> This is a common answer, but rather non-transhumanistic. Can't we
> change without having people die? We want our ideas to die instead of
> us.
Yes, what good is progress if you're not around to benefit from
it?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:59 MST