From: James D. Wilson (netsurf@sersol.com)
Date: Tue Feb 02 1999 - 09:08:09 MST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ever hear of Kevin Mitnick? He's been in jail for three (3) years now
without trial.
As for authentication solutions etc. this is fine and good but until
IPng it is not likely to fly because it requires every server to
cooperate unless you want to isolate yourself from the net.
The law that makes the most sense is one prohibiting the transfer of
the cost of the mailing from the sender to the intermediate networks
and ultimately the end recipient. This is why the TCPA junk fax law
has upheld to date. This type of law (cost transfer) will cover
future types of situations such as people spamming your palm pilot or
spamming your digital pager or even spamming your PCS phone. This is
the type of law which was just submitted to the Texas Congress. Even
California is considering additional laws because their original one
just doesn't have enough teeth in it.
The only way you will be able to significantly reduce spam is to make
it no longer profitable and worth the risk. You will always have some
clueless chicken-boner spammers out there but we will be able to put
it to a quick stop be it by LARTing the spammer or by terminating his
access.
There is no one solution to the problem - it will take a combination
of efforts to rid the net of +90% of this junk.
- -
James D. Wilson
"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
William of Ockham (1285-1347/49)
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-extropians@extropy.com
[mailto:owner-extropians@extropy.com]On Behalf Of mark@unicorn.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 1:10 AM
To: extropians@extropy.com
Subject: Re: Junk mail and rotting web (SPAM)
Michael S. Lorrey [retroman@together.net] wrote:
>Sending email which claims to promote one kind of website when it
actually is
>linked to another type is also mail and wire fraud.
The mail and wire fraud laws are very, very good examples of why
spamming
laws are a really bad idea. Just take a look sometime at the numerous
cases
where these laws are used for things they were never intended to
cover; back
when I kept up with the hacking press, it seemed that practically
every US
hacker caught was charged with wire fraud with its high penalties,
even
though the crime was never intended to apply to hacking.
>If a spammer can be charged for every one of the thousands or
millions
>of spam messages they send, then they will be spending a lot of time
in
>prison (probably more than their entire adult life) and paying
whopping
>fines.
Oh get real. Late time I checked the average murderer spent about
eight
years in jail; you want to put spammers in jail for longer than
murderers!?
Do you have any idea how much these kind of laws are screwing up the
US
legal system? Next time someone's accused of spamming they'll just
come
out shooting, because they'll have nothing to lose...
This list is really going downhill.
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2
Comment: Spammers are NetAbusers - Jail Them With The Other Criminals
iQA/AwUBNrci6TAufbtGOmgdEQLGMQCfaSvpfgv/C7LmVquLsnTw/g7wHuIAnjRY
hjimu8ZdVvRsK9oi5ELSoAXL
=DE4y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:59 MST