From: T0Morrow@aol.com
Date: Wed Jan 20 1999 - 11:46:00 MST
The issue with regard to collective entities made up of humans is not whether
they exist in some sense. The question is whether they have sufficient
coherence to entertain cognitive states. Perhaps it makes sense to say of
some small and purely voluntaristic organizations, such as partnerships or
clubs, that they think, believe, and act (though I think even that usage goes
too far). But whole societies fail utterly to behave like individuals.
Notwithstanding the incoherence of large social collectives, certain
individuals, for reasons of public choice, find it advantageous to attribute
cognitive states to them. I like to make light of this with a little joke:
"As a society," the politician said, "I have decided . . . ."
Comparative references to how cells make up bodies or how dots make up a
photograph thus do not resolve the question at hand. Neither cells nor dots
nor, for that matter, photos, entertain cognitive states. We individual
humans do,
Ian Goddard wrote:
> So the question is: Is the photo an illusion?
> If yes, the collective entity is an illusion.
> If no, then the collective entity is real.
T.0. Morrow
t0morrow@aol.com
http://members.aol.com/t0morrow/T0Mpage.HTML
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:53 MST