From: Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@together.net)
Date: Tue Jan 19 1999 - 07:59:12 MST
EvMick@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/15/99 12:43:57 PM Central Standard Time, hal@rain.org
> writes:
>
> >
> > But does socialism inherently involve advocating the use of force? Can't
> > it be organized on a voluntary basis?
>
> I don't recall any instance where socialism hasn't involved force, ultimately.
> Have there been actual examples?
>
I would say that with the sole exception of communes and kibbutzes, which still
relied on significant amounts of peer pressure, no socialist organization with any
political power has worked for very long without force. My opinion for this is
that since communalism is so much of an anathema to human nature that force must
be used to maintain a population in permanent residency. Note that communes and
kibbutzes do have significant turnover levels, mostly of young adults coming and
going once they got the socialist bug worked out of their systems. I admit that
when I was a teenager that I considered myself a socialist for about two weeks...
then I regained my sanity and actually thought things through. I once heard
someone say that they would be worried about a person who had not been a socialist
for at least 15 minutes in their lives....
Mike Lorrey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:52 MST