From: Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@together.net)
Date: Fri Jan 15 1999 - 09:26:20 MST
Samael wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander 'Sasha' Chislenko <sasha1@netcom.com>
>
> >As driving is a stressful activity, time saved from it will likely
> >reduce mortality from other reasons.
> >
> >Add to this the unaccounted factors mentioned in the beginning of this
> >message, and also considerations that reliance upon police instead of
> >common sense is not good for personal development, that it takes more
> >human life time to pay police expenses for enforcing speed limits,
> >that people who save time are usually more careful and more productive
> >than people who speed unreasonably (and don't have to suffer for their
> >stupidity) - and you will see that *higher speed limits save lives*.
>
> One problem with your argument. when you are speeding, you don't
> necessaitly hit another speeding person.
>
> If I'm doing 50 and you're doing 90 and you hit me, it wasn't my fault and
> I'm dead too.
>
Here's a question: Does the study examine differences in the range of speeds
used on the same roads at the same time? I would imagine that if everyone were
going 80 mph they would be driving much more safely than if people on a
highway were driving a range of speeds from 50-80. I'm sure that if everyone
were driving 80 they'd have a higher risk during the time they were driving
than if everyone were driving 50, but they would also be on the road at least
40% less time than those driving 50, so their overall cumulative risk may be
lower even though their minute by minute risk may be higher, as you
calculated.
Mike Lorrey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:50 MST